[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":60},["ShallowReactive",2],{"person-tobias-bremi-en":3},[4],{"id":5,"date":6,"date_gmt":7,"guid":8,"modified":10,"modified_gmt":11,"slug":12,"status":13,"type":14,"link":15,"title":16,"template":18,"class_list":19,"acf":24,"lang":35,"translations":36,"pll_sync_post":38,"_links":39},101,"2019-04-09T15:24:57","2019-04-09T13:24:57",{"rendered":9},"http:\u002F\u002Fislerpedrazzini.ch\u002Fwordpress\u002F?post_type=personen&p=101","2024-04-08T23:22:22","2024-04-08T21:22:22","tobias-bremi","publish","personen","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.islerpedrazzini.ch\u002Fwordpress\u002Fen\u002Fpersonen\u002Ftobias-bremi\u002F",{"rendered":17},"Tobias Bremi","",[20,14,21,22,23],"post-101","type-personen","status-publish","hentry",{"name":17,"diploma":25,"role":26,"profile_image":27,"email_address":28,"vcard":29,"publikationen":30,"referate":31,"mitgliedschaften":32,"profile_image_thumbnail":33,"role_profile_detail":26,"description_text":34},"Dr. sc. nat. ETH, Dipl. CEIPI","Swiss & European Patent Attorney","https:\u002F\u002Fres.cloudinary.com\u002Fislerpedrazzini\u002Fimages\u002Ff_auto,q_auto\u002Fv1712610246\u002Ftobias_bremi_full_080424\u002Ftobias_bremi_full_080424.jpg?_i=AA","tobias.bremi@islerpedrazzini.ch","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.islerpedrazzini.ch\u002Fwordpress\u002Fwp-content\u002Fuploads\u002F2019\u002F04\u002Ftobias-bremi.vcf","\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>Annotation of Art. 3-6, 17-20a, 29-31, 125-127 in Stämpflis Handkommentar SHK, Mark Schweizer und Herbert Zech, 1st edition 2019\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>A New Approach to Priority Entitlement: Time for Another Resolving EPO Decision? GRUR Int. 2\u002F2018, p. 128\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>When in Rome do as the Romans do? Die Klarstellung der Beschwerdekammern des EPA zur Übertragung von Prioritätsrechten in T205\u002F14 und deren Befolgung in der neueren europäischen nationalen Rechtsprechung, sic! 3\u002F2017 p. 109\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Genügt das Auffinden eines bisher unbekannten Problems, um erfinderische Tätigkeit zu begründen? – Kommentar zu BGE 114 II 82 («Schneehalter»), I. Zuberbühler, P. Münch, M. Schweizer, M. Schwenninger (Hrsg.), Immaterialgüterrecht in kommentierten Leitentscheiden, Schulthess 2015\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Wie wirken sich Zweckangaben in Patentansprüchen auf den Schutzbereich aus, und: wieweit reicht der Schutz gegen indirekte Patentverletzungen durch Teilnahmehandlungen? – Kommentar zu BGE 122 II 81 («Beschickungseinrichtung»), I. Zuberbühler, P. Münch, M. Schweizer, M. Schwenninger (Hrsg.), Immaterialgüterrecht in kommentierten Leitentscheiden, Schulthess 2015\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Toxische Prioritäten und Teilanmeldungen – endlich eine klärende Vorlage an die Grosse Beschwerdekammer des Europäischen Patentamts? sic! 9\u002F2015, p. 503-515\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Methods of thinking of engineers, natural scientists and lawyers – attempt of a comparison, Le droit de la propriété intellectuelle dans un monde globalisé, Mélanges en l’honneur du professeur Joanna Schmidt-Szalewski, Collections CEIPI No 61 (with Dieter Stauder, Gerd Fussmann, Uwe Dreiss, Klaus Haase-Aschoff)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Discussion of Art 58-62, 66, 87-89 in Margarete Singer \u002F Dieter Stauder \u002F Stefan Luginbühl (Hrsg), Europäisches Patentübereinkommen EPÜ, Kommentar, Heymanns Taschenkommentare, 6th edition 2013 and follow-up editions (currently 8th edition 2019)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Patente und Designs: Der Schutz von technischen Innovationen, in: Schweizer IP-Handbuch, Editors Conrad Weinmann, Peter Münch, Jürg Herren, Publisher Helbing Lichtenhahn, 1st edition 2013 and 2nd edition 2021\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Das Schweizer Bundespatentgericht – ein neuer schneller Weg zu Verletzungsurteilen in Europa, Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte 12\u002F2012, p. 529-532\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>«A Truth Universally Acknowledged….» – Still? or Double Patenting at the EPO, Current Status, epi Information 3\u002F2011 (with David Harrison)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Divisionals and Deemed Withdrawal – A Way out of the Mist? epi Information 2\u002F2011 (with Nicolas Bouche, Sven-Erik Braitmayer, Derk Visser)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Finally! EPO disentangles novelty and inventive step considerations for selection inventions, epi Information 1\u002F2011\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Traps when transferring priority rights, or When in Rome do as the Romans do: A discussion of some recent European and national case law and its practical implications, epi Information 1\u002F2010\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Einreichung von US Provisional Applications und Übertragung von Prioritätsrechten: Einige ungeahnte Fallstricke in der Praxis anhand von aktueller Rechtsprechung des EPA und aus Frankreich, sic! 4\u002F2010, p. 100-108\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Self-collision with your own priority application under Art. 54(3)? T1443\u002F05 and its possible consequences on filing strategies, Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte 5\u002F2009, p. 206-210\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>«It is a truth universally acknowledged …» or Double patenting and the EPC, epi Information 2\u002F2009, p. 64-68 (with David Harrison)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>The European Patent Convention and Proceedings before the European Patent Office (EPC 2000), Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2008\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Divide et impera? Die Antwort der Grossen Beschwerdekammer in den Entscheidungen G1\u002F05 und G1\u002F06, sic! 3\u002F2008, p. 251 et seq.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Haben die Europäischen Beschwerdekammern eine etwas reduzierte «Schirmtheorie» bei Prioritäten eingeführt? Kritische Diskussion der T665\u002F00 (L’Oréal), Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte 11\u002F2006, p. 490-495 (with Privat Vigand)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Divide et impera? Recent case law related to divisional applications before the EPO, Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte 2\u002F2006, p. 49-56 (with David Harrison)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Entwarnung: Keine Erschöpfung des Prioritätsrechts, sic! 9\u002F2005, p. 698 et seq. (with Michael Liebetanz)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>No exhaustion of priority rights!? epi Information 4\u002F2005, p. 139 (with Michael Liebetanz)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Kann man ein Prioritätsrecht «verbrauchen»? Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte 4\u002F2004, S. 148 et seq. (with Michael Liebetanz)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Kann man ein Prioritätsrecht «verbrauchen»? sic! 2\u002F2004, p. 141 et seq.\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Gemeinschaftspatent: Kommt es nun doch? Diskussion von möglichen Konsequenzen für Schweizer Unternehmen, sic! 6\u002F2003, p. 530 et seq. (with Vincenzo M. Pedrazzini)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C\u002Ful>\n","\u003Ch5>Regularly:\u003C\u002Fh5>\n\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>Courses for the education of European Patent Attorneys (CEIPI), Part D in Strasbourg (yearly, 3-5 days, since 2002)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Zurich VESPA seminar on case law of the Swiss Federal Patent Court (yearly, since 2013)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Lecture about the Federal Patent Court within IGE courses for Patent Attorney training (yearly, two days, since 2012)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>WRM lecture HSG on intellectual property rights (biennially, since 2008)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>MBA lecture HSG on intellectual property rights (biennially, since 2015)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C\u002Ful>\n\u003Ch5>Others (selection from 2016):\u003C\u002Fh5>\n\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>“Entitlement to Priority”, lecture at Fordham Conference, New York, April 24, 2019\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“Swiss Patent Court and Patent Risk Management”, lecture, St. Gallen, August 28, 2018\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“The Swiss FPC and its case law “, lecture to an Australian delegation, St. Gallen, January 18, 2018\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“Entitlement to Priority”, lecture at EPO, Munich, November 23, 2017\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“Äquivalenz beim CH BPatGer”, lecture at VESPA Seminar, Basel, November 3, 2017\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“A spotlight onto case law of the Swiss FPC”, lecture to an Australian delegation, St. Gallen, January 24, 2016\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“Patentverletzungsrisiken im technisch-innovativen Unternehmen, Identifikation, Bewertung und Elemente für deren Steuerung”, lecture, Zurich, September 22, 2016\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“The interaction between technically and legally qualified judges in patent litigation”, lecture at CEIPI Strasbourg, September 22, 2016\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“AIPPI Milan, Panel Session VIII, Priority Rights”, lecture at AIPPI Meeting Milan, September 19, 2016\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“Watches and other Mechanics at the Swiss Federal Patent Court”, lecture at IGE, Berne, September 15, 2016\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“Interaction TJ’s and LJ’s in patent litigation @ CH-BPatGer”, lecture at EPO, Munich, July 7, 2016\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>“Das Schweizer Patent aus Sicht des BPatGer”, lecture at IGE, Berne, January 22, 2016\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C\u002Ful>\n","\u003Cul>\n\u003Cli>AIPPI\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>epi\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>ETH Alumni\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>FICPI\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>INGRES\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>IPJA\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>LES\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>Schweizerische Chemische Gesellschaft\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>SVRH\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>VESPA\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003Cli>VSP\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C\u002Ful>\n","https:\u002F\u002Fres.cloudinary.com\u002Fislerpedrazzini\u002Fimages\u002Ff_auto,q_auto\u002Fv1712610410\u002Ftobias_bremi_thumb_080424\u002Ftobias_bremi_thumb_080424.jpg?_i=AA","\u003Cp>After studying physical chemistry at ETH Zurich and writing his doctoral thesis in the group of Prof. Dr. R.R. Ernst in the field of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), Tobias Bremi was drawn to business despite his unquenched fascination for the fundamentals of natural sciences and applied technology. The work at the interface between the latest innovative technology and law continued to fascinate him then as it does now and prompted him to start training as a patent attorney in a small law firm in Zurich in 1998. He spent a year in Strasbourg (France) at the Université Robert Schuman to acquire sound legal knowledge in the IP field and in-depth language skills, and passed the European Qualifying Examination in 2001. Shortly afterwards, in 2002, he moved to Isler & Pedrazzini AG to gain experience in larger cases in an even more professional environment with colleagues from various fields. He has been a partner in the firm since 2006, continuing to advise clients with enthusiasm to this day.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>His wide-ranging practice extends in particular to the fields of mechanical and medical engineering, (bio)chemistry, materials science, plastics technology and analytic chemistry. Tobias Bremi not only has many years of experience in proceedings to obtain patents in the most important industrialized nations, but also regularly advises and represents his clients in contentious proceedings concerning the validity and infringement of patents. Tobias Bremi also frequently conducts IP due diligence assessments.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>In 2011, Tobias Bremi had the unique opportunity to play an active role in setting up the new Swiss Federal Patent Court. He was elected by the Federal Assembly as the second full-time judge and built up the court together with the first President, Dieter Brändle. Since the Swiss Federal Patent Court became operational, he has spent 50% of his time there as one of two permanent judges.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp>From the very beginning of his career as a patent attorney, it has been important to Tobias Bremi to be active in teaching and in the further development of the legal profession. He has been a tutor for the training of European Patent Attorneys at CEIPI in Strasbourg (since 2002) and, until 2010, for the basic course in Zurich. Furthermore, he was a lecturer at ETH in the program “MAS in Intellectual Property” for several years, is a lecturer at the University of St. Gallen (Executive School of Management) as part of the program “Business Law for Managers” (since 2008) as well as at the CAS in IP Management at the University of Applied Sciences of Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW) (since 2009) and as part of the training of Swiss patent attorneys at the IPI (since 2012). He has also been a member of the Board of the Association for Intellectual Property Law (INGRES) since 2013.\u003C\u002Fp>\n","en",{"en":5,"de":37},100,[],{"self":40,"collection":46,"about":49,"wp:attachment":52,"curies":55},[41],{"href":42,"targetHints":43},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.islerpedrazzini.ch\u002Fwordpress\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fperson\u002F101",{"allow":44},[45],"GET",[47],{"href":48},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.islerpedrazzini.ch\u002Fwordpress\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fperson",[50],{"href":51},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.islerpedrazzini.ch\u002Fwordpress\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Ftypes\u002Fpersonen",[53],{"href":54},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.islerpedrazzini.ch\u002Fwordpress\u002Fwp-json\u002Fwp\u002Fv2\u002Fmedia?parent=101",[56],{"name":57,"href":58,"templated":59},"wp","https:\u002F\u002Fapi.w.org\u002F{rel}",true,1783527373949]